Irish Divorce / Joyce's Ulysses

Zusatztext

<p>This engrossing, ground-breaking book challenges the long-held conviction that prior to the second divorce referendum of 1995 Irish people could not obtain a divorce that gave them the right to remarry. Joyce knew otherwise, as Peter Kuch revealsobtaining a decree absolute in Edwardian Ireland, rather than separation from bed and board, was possible. Blooms Divorce, not now and Mollys suppose I divorced himwhether whim, wish, fantasy, or convictionreflects an Irish practice of petitioning the English court, a ruse that, even though it was known to lawyers, judges, and politicians at the time, has long been forgotten. By drawing attention to divorce as one response to adultery, Joyce created a domestic and legal space in which to interrogate the sometimes rival and sometimes collusive Imperial and Ecclesiastical hegemonies that sought to control the Irish mind. This compelling, original book provides a refreshingly new frame for enjoying<i>Ulysses</i>even as it prompts thegeneral reader to think about relationships and about the politics of concealment that operate in forging national identity</p>

Autorenportrait

Peter Kuch studied with Richard Ellmann and John Kelly at Oxford. Since then he has held posts at the University of Newcastle, Australia; Université de Caen, France; and the University of New South Wales, Australia. He has also held Fellowships at the Australian National University; Trinity College, Dublin; and Notre Dame, Indiana. At present he is the inaugural Eamon Cleary Professor of Irish Studies at the University of Otago in New Zealand. <p> </p>

Weitere Details