Dominion of Redemption

Zusatztext

With Charles Vs Imperial Coronation in 1530 in Bologna, the relationship between imperial and ecclesiastical government was reconfigured according to the Emperors sovereign capacities in administering the temporal concerns alongside the development of ecclesiastical affairs. This consolidation of Charles Vs imperial government represented a major challenge in respect to the Roman Curias insights regarding the contemporary theological conceptions contesting Roman ecclesiastical government. Following the election of Pope Paul III in 1534 and the creation of a Consilium de emendanda ecclesiae two years later, this great issue was to be principally resolved by a commission of cardinals and Curial prelates in anticipation of a general Church council that was to resolve the theological disparities between Catholic and Protestant positions regarding on ecclesiology. The Consilium thus served as a consulting entity within the Roman Curia concerning Pope Paul IIIs ambitions for calling a Church council. Contrary to previous scholarship, this study demonstrates how this particular commission acted in following a Curial program of neutralizing the papal strategies of pacifying the Emperor Charles V and King Francis I. This reinterpretation of the Consilium de emendanda ecclesiae and of its members is presented through the conflicting relationship between the Roman Curia and Pope Paul III regarding the calling of a general Church council that was to instill a reorganization of Roman ecclesiastical government. To demonstrate this overlooked dynamic between papal and curial administration of ecclesiastical government, the study reconstructs the emergence of a novel climate of Curial ecclesiastic erudition that was starting to be formed within the environments of Cardinal Marcello Cervini and his important printing enterprises. The most significant member of Cardinal Cervinis initiatives was the Greek scholar and later Cardinal Guglielmo Sirleto. While various scholars have been keen in recognizing Sirletos contributions to various shapes and forms of the curial administration of the Roman Church, his career and his literary production as a curial prelate and one of the most important curial counselors in the entourage of various pontiffs concerning the development of Roman ecclesiastical government during the sixteenth century still remains a large desideratum in modern scholarship. In placing Sirleto and his personal career within the labyrinthine structures of the Roman Curia and of papal ecclesiastical power at the center of the study, the book proposes a novel interpretation not only of how the Curia acted as a heterogenous entity in the overall composition of Roman ecclesiastical government, but how the sapientissimo Calabro Guglielmo Sirleto evolved in establishing a system of administering the various ecclesiastical affairs of the Roman Church through the manipulation as well as adjustment of Roman theological thought in the late Cinquecento. By placing Sirleto and his career within the labyrinthine structures of the Roman Curia and papal power, this book offers a novel interpretation of the Curia not only as a heterogeneous entity within Roman ecclesiastical governance but also as a system shaped by Sirletos strategic administration of ecclesiastical affairs. Through his manipulation and adaptation of Roman theological thought in the late Cinquecento, Sirleto played a pivotal role in defining ecclesiastical governance. This book builds upon the preceding projects exploration of political thought in Roman ecclesiastical governance, analyzing how theological discourse was controlled and circulated through the machinery of the Roman Curia. The second part of the trilogy Holy Family and Sacred Palace thus fundamentally rethinks previous contributions made towards Early Modern political thought after Quentin Skinners momentous Foundations of Modern Political Thought, and proposes, for the first time, a major interpretive model for understanding ecclesiastical political thought.

Autorenportrait

Filip Malesevic, University of Fribourg, Switzerland.

Weitere Details